Ouroboros: Difference between revisions

From Ouroboros
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 58: Line 58:
''Main Article'': [[History of Ouroboros]]
''Main Article'': [[History of Ouroboros]]


The Ouroboros project has its roots in European-funded projects on [[RINA]]. After contributions to the RINA prototyping efforts in [[IRATI]] and [[PRISTINE]], we decided to start our own RINA prototype. Gradually, we found various problems in the RINA specifications that led Ouroboros to significantly diverge from RINA.
The Ouroboros project has its roots in European-funded projects on [[RINA]]. After contributions to the RINA prototyping efforts in [[IRATI]] and [[PRISTINE]], a decision was made to start new RINA prototypes, one was [[rlite]], the other Ouroboros. While it started as a RINA prototype, after finding numerous inefficiencies in RINA, Ouroboros diverged significantly from its base specifications, enough to warrant calling the model on which Ouroboros is based a different architecture alltogether.


== Differences compared to TCP/IP ==
== Differences compared to TCP/IP ==

Revision as of 16:41, 31 May 2022

Ouroboros (abbreviated as "O7s") is a work-in-progress packet-switched Internetwork prototype created by Dimitri Staessens and Sander Vrijders at IMEC / Ghent University early 2016.

Objectives

What we need to clear right out of the way is that our main driver to create Ouroboros was not to solve any specific perceived engineering problems within TCP/IP, or RINA, or whatever other network design. It is also not developed to add some functionality that we perceive as missing in TCP/IP or any other network technology.

Our main driver is to figure out the fundamental laws that govern packet networks as a whole. Laws that, when broken, cause the network to cease operation or become unscalable.

The aim is to come to a model that explains the fundamentals for the following network functions as elegantly as possible:

  • best effort delivery of packets
  • in-order delivery
  • reliable delivery
    • re-transmission of lost packets
    • detection of unwanted packets
    • transmission of packets over diverse paths, possibly sending multiple copies, potentially using some erasure-coding scheme
    • transmission of packets over diverse networks, possible sending multiple copies, potentially using some erasure-coding scheme
  • filtering out received duplicates
  • multiple traffic classes with different scheduling priorities
  • security
    • encryption
    • authentication
  • flow control: sender does not send more traffic than a receiver can cope with
  • congestion avoidance: total offered load to the network does not cause systematic delays (or loss) in packet delivery beyond the expected latency due to packet processing in nodes and propagation delays over the links.
  • fragmentation of an application message into smaller network packets, and reassembly
  • naming a service
  • locating a process that provides access to the named service
  • establishing an association between the process that consumes the service and the process that provides access to the service

The prototype is an implementation to validate these ideas.

Model

Main Article: Ouroboros model

The model consists of the following elements:

Prototype

Main Article: Ouroboros prototype

  • IRMd
  • IPCPs
  • Ouroboros library

History

Main Article: History of Ouroboros

The Ouroboros project has its roots in European-funded projects on RINA. After contributions to the RINA prototyping efforts in IRATI and PRISTINE, a decision was made to start new RINA prototypes, one was rlite, the other Ouroboros. While it started as a RINA prototype, after finding numerous inefficiencies in RINA, Ouroboros diverged significantly from its base specifications, enough to warrant calling the model on which Ouroboros is based a different architecture alltogether.

Differences compared to TCP/IP

Main Article: Differences between Ouroboros and TCP/IP

  • Decoupled flow control and congestion avoidance
  • Only explicit congestion avoidance

Differences compared to OSI

Main Article: Differences between Ouroboros and OSI

  • Not sure I want to do this...

Differences compared to RINA

Main Article: Differences between Ouroboros and RINA

RIB/CDAP is abstracted as a broadcast layer.

No "shim layers", all IPCPs implement a Flow Allocator.